PRP Therapy for Knee OA: A Cross-Comparison of Treatments

As a healthcare professional specializing in Orthobiologics, my mission is to provide effective, non-surgical options to help our patients overcome joint pain. A standout treatment that has generated substantial interest and delivered impressive results in our practice is Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) therapy.

PRP therapy is remarkable because it capitalizes on your body's own healing mechanisms. In layman's terms, we extract a sample of your blood, enhance the concentration of healing platelets, and then inject this enriched blend into the afflicted knee joint. The goal of this treatment is to decrease pain and stiffness while improving knee functionality.

A recent study offers valuable insight into PRP therapy's potency when compared to other prevalent treatments for knee osteoarthritis, such as corticosteroids and hyaluronic acid. The study found that six months after treatment, PRP therapy was as effective, and in some cases, even more so than these other treatments, providing enhanced pain relief, improved function, and reduced stiffness.

These encouraging findings mirror the positive outcomes we've witnessed firsthand in our practice. Numerous patients have experienced considerable pain alleviation and enhanced mobility following PRP treatment, underscoring its potential as a compelling non-surgical solution for knee osteoarthritis.

As we persistently explore and comprehend the potential of PRP and other Orthobiologic treatments, our commitment remains unwavering: to offer you the most innovative and efficacious solutions for joint pain. Stay tuned to our blog for more updates on the exciting advances in Orthobiologics and regenerative medicine.

References:

Costa, L. A. V., Lenza, M., Irrgang, J. J., Fu, F. H., & Ferretti, M. (2023). How Does Platelet-Rich Plasma Compare Clinically to Other Therapies in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 51(4), 1074-1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465211062243